Docker networking with dedicated network containers

Mon 06 October 2014 by Lars Kellogg-Stedman Tags docker networking kubernetes

The current version of Docker has a very limited set of networking options:

  • bridge -- connect a container to the Docker bridge
  • host -- run the container in the global network namespace
  • container:xxx -- connect a container to the network namespace of another container
  • none -- do not configure any networking

If you need something more than that, you can use a tool like pipework to provision additional network interfaces inside the container, but this leads to a synchronization problem: pipework can only be used after your container is running. This means that when starting your container, you must have logic that will wait until the necessary networking is available before starting your service.

The kubernetes project uses a clever solution to this problem:

Begin by starting a no-op container -- that is, a container that does not run any services -- with --net=none. It needs to run something; otherwise it will exit. The kubernetes/pause image implements an extremely minimal "do nothing but wait" solution.

Once you have this no-op container running, you can set up the corresponding network namespace to meet your requirements. For example, you can create a veth device pair and place one end in the interface and attach another to a bridge on your system. Pipework can help with this, but you can also perform all the changes by hand

Once your networking is configured, start your actual service container with --net=container:<id-of-noop-container>. Your service container will start with your configured network environment.

You could, I suppose, decide to link every service container with it's own network container, but that would get messy. Kubernetes groups containers together into "pods", in which all containers in a pod share the same network namespace, which reduces the number of "networking containers" necessary for services that have the same networking requirements.

This solution -- linking your service container with a no-op container used to implement networking -- solves the problems identified at the beginning of this post: because you can perform all your network configuration prior to starting your service, your service container does not need any special logic to deal with interfaces that will be created after the container starts. The networking will already be in place when the service starts.

Docker issue 7455 proposes a docker-native solution that would accomplish largely the same thing without requiring the separate networking container (by permitting you to pre-configure a network namespace and then pass that to docker using something like --net=netns:<name-of-network-namespace>).


Comments